How to Spot a Creative Idea
I recently made the case (“On Craftsmanship,” Sept. 2010) that a classical artistry rests upon two mighty pillars: craftsmanship and creativity. The second of the two, I wrote, cannot stand without the first. Here’s why:
WE ALL KNOW that making art has something to do with creativity, so it seems easy to believe that an artist’s job is to search for creative ideas. After all, some of the most celebrated masterworks in history also seem to be some of the most creative, which might suggest that the artists who made them were champion idea hunters.
Maximalist artists believe this, too. In the competitive world of maximalism, an unconstrained artist will often find himself thinking, “Gosh, my rival is so popular. They all love his latest idea, so I should come up with something that’s similar…but even more creative!” And it doesn’t sound silly at the time.

CLASSICISTS NEVER SEARCH for creative ideas, because plenty of creative ideas find them. Yes, that’s right. A classical artist needs merely to reach out and take her pick of the best creative ideas that happen to float through her head. That may sound like an unreliable process now, but by the end of the article, I hope to convince you otherwise.
Although there’s more to this process than meets the eye, nothing mysterious or otherworldly is going on. When an artist stumbles upon a creative idea, it’s simply called SERENDIPITY—the discovery of something unsought. As you might know, serendipity has been the source of many of the world’s biggest breakthroughs. The Oxford Dictionary of Medicine reports that even “the Nobel Prize, the ultimate accolade for scientific development, has been awarded to many [scientists] for their serendipitous discoveries.”
So far, my message has not sounded very helpful. In fact, you probably feel a bit discouraged. Should we just sit on the sofa and wait for ideas? Is there nothing an artist can do? On the contrary, there’s a very good reason why the serendipitous discovery of a scientific idea is usually made by a scientist—not by a banker, not by a lawyer, and most definitely not by a couch potato.
“CHANCE FAVORS THE PREPARED MIND,” declared Louis Pasteur, who discovered a new method of vaccination after making a research error on one serendipitous day in the 1870s. With those words, Pasteur observed something very important about the nature of serendipity: unexpected ideas will come most readily to a scientist who is so very familiar with what he’s doing—and with what he expects to find—that he can easily recognize and evaluate the unexpected idea when it strikes. Without a prepared mind, the brilliant idea would simply go unnoticed.
Of course, there’s a more obvious factor involved here as well, the one that rules out couch potatoes: As a scientist, you’ve got to be doing something, not only to gain the mastery of a prepared mind but simply to ensure that ideas of some sort will continue to pop into your head. Not all of them will be brilliant, and you will pass over dozens of the less spectacular thoughts that drift your way, probably without even realizing it.
That’s okay. When your mind is well-prepared, you won’t miss the big one.
THE SAME IS TRUE for artmaking. And how can painters, composers, and writers go about preparing their minds? With the craftsmanship and routine of a constrained classical artistry.
“The theory is simple enough,” write David Bayles and Ted Orland in their insightful little book, Art & Fear. When making art, “respond automatically to the familiar, and you’re then free to respond selectively to the unfamiliar.”
In today’s world, many cash-strapped artists might find the thought of working in a familiar style over and over again foolhardy. To allow creativity to seemingly take care of itself can be terrifying.
The author Elizabeth Gilbert has become one of the most outspoken critics of this anxiety, this maximalist worry that your creative productions won’t measure up to your neighbors’. She shares her wisdom in this heartfelt video.
Like Gilbert, fellow author Stephen King has a clear understanding of how artists should—and should not—spend their time: “Don’t wait for the muse,” he advises in On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft. King practices his own classical artistry by requiring himself to write no less than ten pages every morning. Although both authors make reference to a “muse,” King’s following remarks remove any doubt that he is actually speaking of serendipity:
This isn’t the Ouija board or the spirit-world we’re talking about here, but just another job like laying pipe or driving long-haul trucks. Your job is to make sure the muse knows where you’re going to be every day from nine ’til noon or seven ’til three. If he does know, I assure you that sooner or later he’ll start showing up…making his magic.
Artmaking isn’t easy. But with a classical artistry, you have the power to find not only creativity but also another word that begins with “c”: confidence.
Trackbacks
- Oxford On My Mind « About the Artist
- Trust Your Materials « About the Artist
- Sesshū: A Japanese Ink Master « About the Artist
- On Craftsmanship « About the Artist
- A Walk with Charles Dickens « About the Artist
- Worlds of Decadence, Enlightenment « About the Artist
- The Power of Deadlines « About the Artist
- A Toast to Classicism « About the Artist
- “Shall We Dance?” Art and Function « About the Artist
- Arts of Our Time « About the Artist
- Games: Classics Can Be Fun « About the Artist
- The Vivaldi Concerto: Raw and Rened « About the Artist
- Escape from the Salon: Claude Monet I « About the Artist
- Framing Your Choices « About the Artist
- One More Time: Constraint of Subject « About the Artist



This is particularly interesting to me: “Chance favors the prepared mind.” I recently read “The Survivors Club: The Secrets and Science that Could Save Your Life” – not the best book I’ve ever read, but it had a whole section on implementing strategies that can increase your luck. It was a very objective, methodological approach to something that’s supposedly not easily manipulatable. He convinced me that “getting lucky” might not be as much due to chance as we believe …
Sounds like an interesting book — I’ll have to check it out. I’ve been thinking about how “chance favors the prepared mind” relates to Steve Johnson’s claim that “chance favors the connected mind.” At first, I thought he disagreed with Pasteur, but now I think the ideas go hand in hand: a prepared mind allows you to better recognize the good ideas when you see them, and a connected mind (like the strategies in the book you mentioned?) allows you to simply see more ideas of all sorts, good and bad.
Thanks for commenting!
Your article on “How to Spot a Creative Idea” leaves a lot of food for thought. Artists of long ago, before the Renaissance period, were able to create ideas without worrying too much about the outcome of the idea. If the artist’s work failed, it was because of the “demons” or “genius” spirits that were not from the human body, as the Greeks and Romans believe, as noted in this article. It did indeed take the pressure off of them. How sad though, that when they had success, they could not claim it as their own. When the Renaissance period entered the world of art, the new thought was that creativity came directly from self, leading the artist to experience a greater sense of fulfillment and accomplishment in his work. The downfall of this belief, as Derek points out in this article, is it also created a lot of pressure on the artist to not fail. “The tortured artist” became a well-known expression describing this time period and still applies today. Unfortunately, suicide in artists with great achievements, especially painters and writers, was very common.
I liked and agreed with the writer, Elizabeth Gilbert, when she says that if you reach a huge success in the beginning of your career, it does create some pressure on your next achievement, especially if you are a younger artist. The artist tends to set a higher standard for herself, often an unrealistic standard, that it must be bigger and better than the last. This kind of thinking can be toxic to the mind, which in turn leads to unnecessary stress, making it more difficult to let natural creativity flow.
I think if the artist could think of himself more in lighter terms and less serious terms and just let the creative juices flow, and say I am doing my best and if an idea comes it comes, if not so be it. A prepared mind will be able to sift through these ideas and will know which ideas is worth pursuing. As long as you work effectivily on your craft with your best efforts on hand, a good idea will be recognizable to the artist. I thought it was quite clever how Tom Waites with a sense of humor, creates a “genius” for himself in these modern day times. He has conversations with his “genius” and basically says to him, that he is doing his best and showing up for his job. Whatever his “genius” says about his work, does not matter to him, which enables him to now experience a freedom to create his work without anxiety or pressure. I am sure that the expression “tortured artist” does not applied to him anymore.
An artist is simply an employer of his craft, like any other employer of an occupation. In Elizabeth Gilbert’s words, “do your job anyhow and keep showing up” is a message of example that all of us should live by. Another well written article by Derek! A lot of food to digest in my thoughts!
Thanks for your comment! Based on what you wrote, I think you’ll really like today’s new article, “Shall We Dance?” Art and Function.”
I should warn you that Elizabeth Gilbert and I have a slight difference in opinion about when exactly the tortured artists first appeared—she says the Renaissance, but I focus more upon the years following the Enlightenment, several centuries later. So in the new article, I do mention the Renaissance, but not in quite the same way that it’s mentioned in her video.